Last month, I wrote on the Dendrosenecios and their diversification
throughout the tropical mountains of eastern and central Africa. The Dendrosenecios
were incredibly well adapted to their harsh environment. The remarkable features that they show, such
as: the large pith volume, the marcescent foliage and nyctinasty were adapted
to their equatorial, tropical alpine environment. Interestingly, a few other places around the
world, such as Hawaii and the tropical Andes have similar climates. In response, other plants within the family Asteraceae have developed the same
adaptations as the Dendrosenecios of
Africa. This is known as convergent
evolution, which can be simply defined as similar adaptations to similar
environments by members of distantly related lineages.
Figure 1.
Asteraceae convergent evolution: The Silversword Alliance of Hawaii
(left) and the Dendrosenecios of
Africa (right).
This month, I will look at a local example
of convergent evolution that is relevant to my Honours Research Project,
focusing on scatter-hoarding in the Proteaceae. There are three major guilds of seed
dispersal in the fynbos, two of them are serotiny and myrmechocory. Serotinous seeds are typically held in the
plant canopy and dispersed by wind, post-fire.
Myrmechocorous seeds have a nutritious tissue called an elaiosome
attached to the seed hull. Ants drag
these seeds underground and consume the elaiosome, leaving the seed intact and
protected from seed predators and fires. The third, scatter-hoarding, is a less
understood dispersal guild in the fynbos.
Seeds of this guild are generally large with thick hulls, lacking a wing
or elaiosome.
Figure 2.
A typical scatter hoarding seed.
This is an image of the tooth marks of Rhabdomys pumilio, known
as the number one seed predator, on the hull of a Ceratocaryum argenteum (Restionaceae) seed.
Scatter-hoarding takes place when rodents
are presented with a glut of seeds and do not have the appetite to eat them
all. In certain species, a behavioral
response is then triggered – they bury the remaining seeds, typically away from
where the seeds were found. They will
then rely on their smell and memory to relocate the seeds they have buried,
extending their use of the food source.
Of course, not all of the seeds are relocated, allowing a dispersal
advantage to the lucky seeds that got away, as they will now not need to
compete with their mother plant.
So, within the broader scope of
scatter-hoarding, are a number of interesting questions that can be asked about
this behavior. A recent area of research
has been the selection for specific seed traits, such as hull thickness, by
predating and scatter-hoarding rodents. Rusch
et al (2012) expected that rodents would preferentially disperse and cache
large, thick hulled seeds but consume small, thin hulled seeds as they are
found.
Initially, the natural variation of the two
seed traits was quantified by extensive measurements of all parameters for Leucadendron sessile seeds – the suncone
bush. The research team then used an
interesting technique to better understand seed selection based on hull
thickness and seed size – because it is rather difficult to determine the
thickness of the hull or fleshiness without breaking the hull open. Firstly, the seed hulls of L. sessile seeds were removed and
replaced with a non-toxic, plumber’s putty as a simulant of a woody hull. This way, the thickness of the seed hull was
controlled for. The putty was placed on
the naked seeds at 1, 2 or 2.5mm. Next,
macadamia nuts were used as a replacement for L. sessile seeds, because their size could be controlled for. The macadamias were sanded down to either be
at the recorded smallest, average or largest sizes and then covered in a
standard 2mm hull thickness. Seeds were
then placed out overnight at seed stations at the research site.
Figure 3. Acomys subspinosus - the Cape spiny mouse.
The biggest culprit of seed removal was
suggested to be Acomys subspinosus or
better known as the Cape Spiny Mouse. The
results of this study are shown in the two figures below. Figure 4 shows the fate of seeds in the hull
thickness experiment. Figure 5 shows the
fate of seeds in the seed size experiment.
Interpretation of the results can be seen in the figure captions.
Figure 4.
Fates of thin-hulled, average-hulled and thick-hulled L. sessile seeds after a 12 hour
exposure to Cape Spiny mice in the field.
Thin-hulled seeds were eaten most often, average-hulled seeds cached and
thick-hulled seeds were not dispersed.
Figure 5.
The fates of small, average and large macadamia seeds after exposure to
the Cape Spiny mice for 12 hours in the field.
Small seed were predominantly eaten, average sized seeds cached and
large seeds not dispersed.
It is clear from this research that rodents
have a preference for which seeds they chose to disperse or consume. Average sized seeds with an average size and
hull-thickness were preferentially dispersed. While seeds that were small or thin-hulled
were most often consumed at the seed stations. Large or thick-hulled seeds were frequently
left at the depot sites. The authors of
this research suggest that the energetic cost of handling, transport and burial
are the reasons for their preferential choices. The importance of these results is that it
suggests that rodents exert stabilizing selection against the extremes of seed
size and hull thickness for L. sessile
seeds.
In the extreme environments of the tropical
alpine zone, the climate creates a selection regime that leads to the distinct
morphological features that are shown by members of the Asteraceae. Around my home,
Cape Town, fynbos plants such as those members of the Proteaceae and Restionaceae
are exerted to a selective regime by seed consuming and dispersing
rodents. Seed predators are common
throughout the fynbos and therefore it has been suggested that the
scatter-hoarding guild of seed dispersal is more common than is currently
understood. Very few of the
relationships between plants and their scatter-hoarding rodents have been
documented, which allows for exciting future research for a young ecologist
like me.
(Rusch, U.D., Midgley, J.J., Anderson, B. 2013. Rodent consumption and caching behaviour selects for specific seed traits. South African Journal of Botany. 84: 83-87)
(Rusch, U.D., Midgley, J.J., Anderson, B. 2013. Rodent consumption and caching behaviour selects for specific seed traits. South African Journal of Botany. 84: 83-87)